10 points
Language "Encryption" by Jeremy Swarm
April 20th, 2006 10:41 PM
i took a clip of a paper i wrote. The original:
First, a brief history of the teachings may assist in this discourse. Socrates, the first of the great Grecian philosophers, lived around 470 BCE. By contrast, the Vedas were first penned is dated to be as old as 1200BCE. If, then, Hindu is a philosophy, It would be the oldest formal philosophy of which I know. It is this age which lend both help and hindrance to the effort to establish Hindu as a "good" philosophy. Its age may, at first indicate that it is the standard to which we might compare other philosophies. Unfortunately, our definition of philosophy, for the purposes of this paper, do not permit this possibility unless it is the greatest philosophy. On the other hand, it may be that, while this was once a useful, insightful, and practical philosophy, it may have fallen obsolete over years of redefinition of the term. If this is the unfortunate case, I cannot help but feel partially responsible for helping distribute this anti-Hindu rhetoric in the name of progress and academia. Be that as it may, an examination of Hindu in modern light is all of which I am capable to produce, having not been raised under a more Hindu-conducive society.
I translated it from english to portugese. treated the PORTUGESE as though it were spanish, and told it to translate it from "spanish" back to english. from english, to french. and from french to italian. from italian, back into english. the result:
Primeiramente, um history brief two ensinos prunes to ajudar neste speech. Socrates, or primeiro two great philosophers of Grecian, lived ao redor 470 BCE. Hair contrasts, or Prohibitions penned primeiramente é dated to be tão velho how much 1200BCE. então, hindu it was uma philosophy, serious to philosophy formal to maize velha of which eu six. É this idade that emprestam to ajuda and or hindrance ao esforço to estabelecer hindu like uma philosophy "buoy". Its idade prunes, inÃcio does not indicated that é or padrão to that nós pudemos to appears outras filosofias. Unfortunately, nossa definição gives philosophy, for you gave ace purposes paper, não allows this possibilidade unless for to philosophy to maize great. Na outra mão, prune- to be itself that, when this was uma useful Time uma philosophy, insightful, and prática, can to ter obsolete excessive anuses fallen gives redefinition gives thermus. This for or unfortunate houses, eu não I can to ajudar but sensação partially responsável to ajudar to distribute this rhetoric anti-anti-Hindu not name I give progress and I give academy. Seja I hoist as it prunes, uma examinação of hindu na modern light that which eu sou able produzir, não tem raised sob uma sociedade hindu-conducive Hindu-maizes.
First, a brief history of the teachings may assist in this discourse. Socrates, the first of the great Grecian philosophers, lived around 470 BCE. By contrast, the Vedas were first penned is dated to be as old as 1200BCE. If, then, Hindu is a philosophy, It would be the oldest formal philosophy of which I know. It is this age which lend both help and hindrance to the effort to establish Hindu as a "good" philosophy. Its age may, at first indicate that it is the standard to which we might compare other philosophies. Unfortunately, our definition of philosophy, for the purposes of this paper, do not permit this possibility unless it is the greatest philosophy. On the other hand, it may be that, while this was once a useful, insightful, and practical philosophy, it may have fallen obsolete over years of redefinition of the term. If this is the unfortunate case, I cannot help but feel partially responsible for helping distribute this anti-Hindu rhetoric in the name of progress and academia. Be that as it may, an examination of Hindu in modern light is all of which I am capable to produce, having not been raised under a more Hindu-conducive society.
I translated it from english to portugese. treated the PORTUGESE as though it were spanish, and told it to translate it from "spanish" back to english. from english, to french. and from french to italian. from italian, back into english. the result:
Primeiramente, um history brief two ensinos prunes to ajudar neste speech. Socrates, or primeiro two great philosophers of Grecian, lived ao redor 470 BCE. Hair contrasts, or Prohibitions penned primeiramente é dated to be tão velho how much 1200BCE. então, hindu it was uma philosophy, serious to philosophy formal to maize velha of which eu six. É this idade that emprestam to ajuda and or hindrance ao esforço to estabelecer hindu like uma philosophy "buoy". Its idade prunes, inÃcio does not indicated that é or padrão to that nós pudemos to appears outras filosofias. Unfortunately, nossa definição gives philosophy, for you gave ace purposes paper, não allows this possibilidade unless for to philosophy to maize great. Na outra mão, prune- to be itself that, when this was uma useful Time uma philosophy, insightful, and prática, can to ter obsolete excessive anuses fallen gives redefinition gives thermus. This for or unfortunate houses, eu não I can to ajudar but sensação partially responsável to ajudar to distribute this rhetoric anti-anti-Hindu not name I give progress and I give academy. Seja I hoist as it prunes, uma examinação of hindu na modern light that which eu sou able produzir, não tem raised sob uma sociedade hindu-conducive Hindu-maizes.