PLAYERS TASKS PRAXIS TEAMS EVENTS
Username:Password:
New player? Sign Up Here
Adam
Land Surveyor
Level 5: 993 points
Alltime Score: 11364 points
Last Logged In: August 17th, 2018
BADGE: Senator BADGE: INTERREGNUM TEAM: United Kingdom TEAM: SFØ Société Photographique TEAM: 0UT TEAM: Urban Picnic Society TEAM: UxbridgeØ BART Psychogeographical Association Rank 4: Land Surveyor The University of Aesthematics Rank 1: Expert Humanitarian Crisis Rank 1: Peacekeeper Society For Nihilistic Intent And Disruptive Efforts Rank 2: Trickster
highscore

retired







45 + 100 points

Statistically Speaking by Adam, Tøm

May 18th, 2008 2:28 PM

INSTRUCTIONS: Study and collect statistics on a common public behavior. For instance, the time it takes museum patrons to use the restroom. Publicly display your results after, or during, the collection process.

The task? Disprove the stereotypes we associate with Great Yarmouth with the use of statistics.

There are a lot of stereotypes us residents would associate with our town; fat, old, chav-filled, pigeon-y all smothered in chip fat. But is Yarmouth really like that? Or are we just focusing on the bad parts? We aimed to find out.

Part 1: There are huge amounts of pigeons in Great Yarmouth.

We set up camp on a bench in Great Yarmouth Market place and counted how many pigeons landed within the space of a minute. We then repeated this for 5 separate minutes, and averaged the numbers.

Consider it disproved, -0.2 pigeons landed? That's right. We have anti-matter pigeons.

We probably should have stopped there and redone the experiment with a different method of measurement, seeing as we only took into account those p
igeons which landed and took off, but the sheer fun of anti-matter pigeons drew us in and we prepared and placed a sign displaying our fact.

We counted pigeons taking off as -1, which was probably the mistake with counting those that landed, but hey, who cares when it results in negative decimal pigeons?


 
Part 2: Yarmouth people are fat.

We then moved down to the opposite end of the market to calculate a fat/thin ratio of Sunday walkers. These results may be skewed in favour of thin people, as the fatter Yarmouthian will often remain stationary for an entire Sunday (I know I have done). As with the pigeons we counted for 1 minute intervals 5 times, then averaged it.

Turns out Yarmouth is fat, by an 8:7 ratio. So it's closer than it seems.

And up goes a sign...


To measure fat Vs Thin, Adam suggested the nicely named bulge test. If it's bulging, they're going on the list.


 
Part 3: Great Yarmouth Market consists of Chip stalls, and little else.


 
This one had signs fighting against it already, so we decided to make it mathematically proven. After 2 counts of the stalls, we found that that there is definitely more to Yarmouth Market than chips. The ratio ended up 11:16 in favour of 'not-chips'.

Yeah, so it's not public behaviour, gonna make somethin' of it punk?


 
Part 4: The majority of Yarmouthians are old people.

For this experiment we moved onto regent road, taking root on a bench and marking some boundaries for where people had to walk through to be counted we began counting. After several separate minutes counting we averaged the numbers, and it came up in favour of....

Old people! Yarmouth is an old persons home of a town!


Not by far though.


 
So there you have it, Yarmouth may be fat and old, but it has anti-pigeons, and stalls other than chip ones!

- smaller

Ready to count

Ready to count

Is it just me who sees a small man on the top of Adams head?


Ready to count

Ready to count

With sun in the eyes.


Marketplace

Marketplace


Pigeons...

Pigeons...

Evil creatures.


Rooftop

Rooftop

This one didn't count.



Sign

Sign

Ignored.


-0.2 pigeons, yep.

-0.2 pigeons, yep.

Anti-matter pigeons!


Chip stalls

Chip stalls

11:16, maths says so.


Stats up.

Stats up.


Not just chips!

Not just chips!

LIES!


Fat to thin people.

Fat to thin people.

8:7, in favour of fat. Proven by MATHS.


Yarmouth is not as fat as expected.

Yarmouth is not as fat as expected.


Fat card

Fat card


Chip stalls

Chip stalls


Chip stall card

Chip stall card


Old tasking

Old tasking

labels still there!!!


BISCUITS!

BISCUITS!

LOOK, IT'S BISCUITS! LOOK AT ALL THE BISCUITY GOODNESS!


Regent road

Regent road


Statistic-ing

Statistic-ing


Adam

Adam

Recording stats


Old to young.

Old to young.

Oldies win!


Old card

Old card

Outside BINGO!



20 vote(s)



Terms

(none yet)

12 comment(s)

(no subject)
posted by Minch on May 18th, 2008 11:51 PM

"LOOK, IT'S BISCUITS! LOOK AT ALL THE BISCUITY GOODNESS!" gloriousness is a photo description

(no subject)
posted by Sparrows Fall on May 19th, 2008 5:47 AM

Hee! You left the last one outside bingo! Excellent.

(no subject) +5
posted by JJason Recognition on May 19th, 2008 11:24 AM

What!

Your pigeon methodology is horrible! That won't prove anything about anything! If you count pigeons taking off as -1 and pigeons landing as 1, then unless all of the pigeons land in Yarmouth and then walk out of town too take off, you'll inevitably get 0. Greater Yarmouth could have a thousand times more pigeons than anywhere else in the world and you'll still get 0!

That's horrible research design! It doesn't tell you anything about how many pigeons you've got!!

-JJason (Who apparently has strong emotions about research design than he previously realized)

(no subject)
posted by Sparrows Fall on May 19th, 2008 11:29 AM

He is kind of right about the pigeon methodology, guys...

=\

(no subject)
posted by Tøm on May 19th, 2008 11:39 AM

Yeah, it is... The desire to talk about anti-pigeons was far too great!

(no subject)
posted by Adam on May 19th, 2008 1:24 PM

We have both done GCSE maths so we knew that was the stupidest way to do it but I kind of wanted to score one for Humanities! by proving the futility of maths and the fact that you can prove anything you want if you have enough numbers. Including anti-pigeons.

Edit: changed the wording, read it back and I sounded jolly agressive. I'm always doing this.

(no subject)
posted by teucer on May 20th, 2008 8:20 AM

I'm in favor of anti-pigeons.

Anti-matter Pigeons
posted by Flitworth on May 20th, 2008 8:12 AM

I believe that this particular completion, above all other GY0 completions, has inspired a desire to visit Great Yarmouth (I should add that GY is mentioned in Lynn Truss' Eats, Shoots & Leaves).

(no subject)
posted by Adam on May 20th, 2008 8:41 AM

Really, in which bit is it mentioned?

Apostrophe Abuse
posted by Flitworth on May 20th, 2008 8:52 AM

I recently proposed an intensive course of ESL instruction based on the book and thusly my administrators are hiding my copy of the book in their desks while they pretend to consider my proposal. It is mentioned because of the following: Hot Dogs a Meal in its’ Self (sign in Great Yarmouth)

Linky link - I can't name the original chapter but any and all should read the book anyway;)

(no subject)
posted by Icarus on July 10th, 2008 5:35 AM

Eats, Shoots, & Leaves is an excellent book. Which bears little upon the general brilliance of anti-matter pigeons.

(no subject)
posted by Tøm on July 10th, 2008 6:27 AM

I shall keep an eye out for that sign.