
15 + 14 points
Correspond with a spammer by David Hayman
June 22nd, 2010 10:06 AM
So there's this Flash chat client called Chatango that most technically-legal-but-not-so-ethical streaming sites use where, if you make a new account, set your gender and age, and leave the box checked, you will be put in a directory whereupon you will be more than likely to receive unwanted solicitations. Being the sort who has always enjoyed taunting solicitors, I periodically register a new alt under a fake email in order to attract the attention of some. Normally it's someone advertising their account on some porn site with a domain name starting with "Ihate" followed by some woman's name, because, from what they've told me, the more people they get to look at their page, the more pictures they unlock for themselves. Of course, a site like this is naturally unsafe, and this porn pyramid scheme system is naturally a fantastic way to propagate malware and viruses. So I often set aside whatever it is I'm doing in order to lecture the solicitor on how irresponsible their behavior is. But sadly, I've not recorded any of said lectures.
However, today I made an alt specifically for this task and throughout today - and possibly the rest of the week - I will be updating this with the transcripts of solicitors whom I shall do my best to harass. This is of course assuming that more come my way.
Below is spammer 1:
Here you can see some jabroni attempting to peddle his smut. Sadly, I couldn't get much of a reaction out of him though, but perhaps the next will be easier to enrage as many in the past have been.
Missing text: kongrain (12:38:47 PM): Hey bra, I saw you in the room and I have to agree...

At the bottom is something from earlier today where someone was spamming periods while I was signed on as monkeyfuture. It's not quite what I'm going for here, so I'll call it bonus material. Also, I found that I actually DID record one failed solicitation of my ArityOfLegend alt from several months ago.
However, today I made an alt specifically for this task and throughout today - and possibly the rest of the week - I will be updating this with the transcripts of solicitors whom I shall do my best to harass. This is of course assuming that more come my way.
Below is spammer 1:
Here you can see some jabroni attempting to peddle his smut. Sadly, I couldn't get much of a reaction out of him though, but perhaps the next will be easier to enrage as many in the past have been.
Missing text: kongrain (12:38:47 PM): Hey bra, I saw you in the room and I have to agree...

At the bottom is something from earlier today where someone was spamming periods while I was signed on as monkeyfuture. It's not quite what I'm going for here, so I'll call it bonus material. Also, I found that I actually DID record one failed solicitation of my ArityOfLegend alt from several months ago.
failedsolicitaion1.jpg

I recently changed the quote to: If the "arity" of an n-ary function refers to the number of arguments it takes such that a function with an arity of two would be called "binary" and one with an arity of three would be called "ternary," then does it not follow that that which is deemed "legendary" would have an arity of legend?