Tony Pryor / Texts
Order by: date ↑ - rating ↑
Well that's the spit. I should have mentioned though, the surfaces are also part of using spit. If you spit on someone, that is going to have different probability than a napkin.
yep, you are operating with the assumption that two dice rolls are unrelated, yet dice rolls may be related in a mathematical description of probability such that they give varying odds in relation to the expectations of people thinking about dice in a meaning involved way that is fuzzy to expectations. there is something that happens when people are playing that results in different expectations of the dice results.
if you are a dice player you probably have experienced expectations regarding the results of a roll, particular a sense when you are rolling dice that you are going to get a result or not as you feel it.
if you deny this as having truth you are denying psychic feedback.
When a person plays craps, each die roll means something to them despite the fact that the rule odds are specific. There is a connotation. But if you are playing fuzzy wuzzy you are playing with a different chain of probability expectations. If there is such a thing as animus and a chakra and impeccable timing and a slam dunk that is perfect, dice rolls can be felt.
To create a story between two people and some dice is to affect the beginning of an animus.
If you need an explanation of how the spiritual physics of an animus or chakra can occur, this may transcend your understanding nature and science. Because your assumptions about science rely largely on not seen experiment but canon if you are modern lazy affinatus.
People will throw i-ching, tea leaves, runes, or tarot cards without disbelieving that there may be some reason to expect an interrelationship between material causality and some specific elements of destiny. With a story and some element like dice, which are fun and physical and have some element of the force in 'em, one can play with a Kolmogorov chain or just the next links.
What I am hearing is that it is not believed that dice rolls are differently random depending on who is rolling, and what is expected. I don't believe this to be empirically accurate according to observation of rollers. Real mathematicians do not like to hear Albert parroted unless they are pathologically lazy about realizing that the development quantam mechanics relies upon his work in understanding spacetime. The word relativity connotes a spacetime relationism, and in a crosstime information transcendant milieu, due to the conceptual demands of story reality in time travel and matter manipulation developing in the near to distant future, which is also possibly considerable as now according to physical possibility if there is an interest in history that is respectful of story faith and belief.
If you don't believe that then can tell me you've never felt the energy in a room change? I don't mean that animal on the left is sweating. I mean a quantam tangible which is an animus and contains all persons present as part of it's dynamics, yet is not merely the metadynamic sum of they.
Otherwise spit and count the drops.
i find man what to be a strange comment. is that apathy?
could you elaborate? why has the text of task been removed?
oh i get it, you hate gay. dang, sf0.