PLAYERS TASKS PRAXIS TEAMS EVENTS
Username:Password:
New player? Sign Up Here
Stu
Level 1: 10 points
Alltime Score: 1767 points
Last Logged In: June 5th, 2014
TEAM: LØVE


retired
15 + 30 points

Document Growth by Stu

November 6th, 2007 1:59 PM

INSTRUCTIONS: Document something growing.

When I first read the instructions, I thought "document" was a noun. I ran with it, and this project, for me, has become one of documenting document growth.

I combined this with Object Annotation, which I have now posted as well. I decided, while in class, to annotate an object on the campus of the university I attend. I would write a note describing my feelings about this object (a metal snowman) and document the growth of the note.

Because I'm a bit of a dork, I wrote the note in LaTeX. Here's the first bit, before I even wrote any note: Basic LaTeX for my note

Then I started to write my note to the snowman: I wrote a paragraph.

And I kept writing: More writing.

And writing: Even more words.

And writing: More words.

And then I compiled it for the first time: Now with pdf and compiler log!

Then I had the finished digital product: Done. Time to print.

And I printed it out and stuck it to the snowman. The whole thing printed out.

The document grew, and I documented its growth.

+ larger

Basic LaTeX for my note
I wrote a paragraph.
More writing.
Even more words.
More words.
Now with pdf and compiler log!
Done. Time to print.
The whole thing printed out.

6 vote(s)



Terms

(none yet)

11 comment(s)

You did the snowman thing!?
posted by Dr. Subtle on November 8th, 2007 9:31 AM

I saw it yesterday! It touched my special place!

(no subject)
posted by Stu on November 8th, 2007 10:28 AM

I'm glad! Good to see you, dude!

(no subject)
posted by Charlie Fish on November 8th, 2007 11:28 AM

Is this really the first time someone thought of doing this task in this way?

(no subject)
posted by Stu on November 8th, 2007 11:33 AM

I wouldn't be surprised if it isn't. I didn't read through most of the others before doing mine.

Go look at my followup, dude!
posted by Dr. Subtle on November 8th, 2007 11:38 AM

I might have, uhh, appropriated your task into my own...

(no subject)
posted by Stu on November 8th, 2007 11:40 AM

Awesome!

Always nice to meet another TeX-head.
posted by Loki on November 8th, 2007 7:58 PM

Welcome to the game.

How'd you find your way to SF0? (The sudden CMU influx is great, but a bit surprising. You do all know each other, yes?)

Regarding turning document into a noun, it's certainly been done for some of the other "document" tasks. (Most notably in Ink Tea's Ink Tea.) But, this is a fun completion none the less.

(no subject)
posted by Stu on November 8th, 2007 8:15 PM

Thank you! It's quite a bit of fun.

A friend of mine in DC (former CMUer) posted to a list a lot of us CMUers are on. So a whole bunch of us joined.

Thanks for pointing me to the Ink Tea. I was thinking about turning food into a document and then dissolving it somehow. Maybe I still will. I was thinking of using pomegranate. But neat to see other ideas and know how to avoid copying them if I want to.

(no subject)
posted by Stu on November 8th, 2007 8:18 PM

Oh, and I love meeting TeXies. Rock on with the TeXing.

(no subject)
posted by Caroline The Curly on November 12th, 2007 12:18 PM

I was thinking about doing this as literal, kind of. As... more physical document growth. Like, you have a printer, and the document gets printed out and its a page. and then ten, then 15, til you have just an enourmous stack of paper. but then i decided that was really evil, because it would waste a lot of trees. and I like trees. and they wouldn't like me if I was mean to them. so I am working on some other way to do that.

(no subject)
posted by Stu on November 12th, 2007 9:36 PM

Caroline: I was thinking of doing that for Document Reproduction, actually, and came to a similar conclusion. This reminds me of a favorite Jack Handey deep thought:

"If trees could scream, would we be so cavalier about cutting them down? We might, if they screamed all the time for no good reason."