PLAYERS TASKS PRAXIS TEAMS EVENTS
Username:Password:
New player? Sign Up Here
The Beekeeper
Justice
Level 4: 597 points
Last Logged In: September 11th, 2014
TEAM: The Disorganised Guerilla War On Boredom and Normality TEAM: San Francisco Zero TEAM: SØS Brigade TEAM: SCIENCE! TEAM: LØVE TEAM: Game of Deception TEAM: Bollywood BART Psychogeographical Association Rank 1: Commuter EquivalenZ Rank 2: Human Googlebot The University of Aesthematics Rank 1: Expert Humanitarian Crisis Rank 2: Justice Biome Rank 1: Hiker Chrononautic Exxon Rank 2: Futurist


25 + 54 points

Proverb Proof by The Beekeeper

October 23rd, 2008 6:38 PM

INSTRUCTIONS: Perform an experiment to verify or disprove a common proverb, when interpreted literally. Can you really catch more flies with honey than vinegar? How many more? Does a stitch in time really save nine? Or does it only save seven? Please note that aphorisms or non-metaphorical proverb-like sayings are not acceptable for this task.

Title: A Watched Pot Never Boils: Investigating the truth behind the proverb

Abstract: This experiment examines the effect of physical observation on a pot of water's ability to reach a temperature of 100 degrees Celsius. While the proverb suggests that a pot, when physically observed, will never reach a boil, this experiment serves to not only disprove that statement, but to also compare the temporal effects physical observation may have on said pot.

Materials:

40 oz. - San Francisco Tap Water at room temperature
1 - Pot
1 - Hot Plate (substitute Gas Burner)
1 - Timer
main_img287970113.jpgProcedure:

Watched Pot

1. Pour 5 cups of water into the pot.
main_img288370114.jpg
2. Light Gas Burner, begin timer
main_img288470115.jpg
3. Watch pot unceasingly (Note: If you remove your eyes from the pot at any time, you must begin the experiment again.)
main_img289270120.jpgmain_img288670116.jpgmain_img288770117.jpgmain_img289670121.jpgmain_img289770122.jpgmain_img289870123.jpgmain_img290370125.jpg
4. Watch for bubbles beginning to form as the temperature of the water rises.main_img289970124.jpgmain_img290470131.jpg
5. When(If) the water begins boiling, stop timer and record time.
6. Turn off Burner, Empty water
7. Allow pot to return to room temperature (wait 1 hour)

Un-watched Pot:

1. Pour 5 cups of water into the pot.
2. Light Gas Burner, begin timer
3. Look away from the pot but remain near enough to hear the sound of boiling. Avoid loud music at this time in the experiment.
4. When you hear the sound of boiling, stop timer and record time.
5. Turn off Burner, Empty water

Observations:
Watched Pot: The watched pot boiled in 6:39 seconds
main_img290770126.jpg
Unwatched pot: The unwatched pot boiled in 6:44 seconds.
main_img292170134.jpgConclusion: A pot of water, when physically observed does in fact boil. In addition, the act of physical observation, as demonstrated in this experiment, is actually a catalyst, causing the pot of water to boil in a shorter amount of time than a pot left-unobserved.

+ larger

Materials
Pour 20 oz of San Francisco Tap water into Pot
Turn burner on and begin timer
Keep your eyes on the pot at all times!
IMG_2892.JPG
keep watching
watching
watching
watching
IMG_2898.JPG
IMG_2903.JPG
starting to form little bubbles
still watching
Boiling!
A watched pot does boil!
Turn burner on and begin timer
Unwatched pot
Now is a great time for a snack
or a drink
Once you hear boiling stop!
Unwatched pot also boils!

19 vote(s)



Favorite of:


Terms

(none yet)

3 comment(s)

(no subject)
posted by rongo rongo on October 23rd, 2008 8:29 PM

Nice! It would be interesting to see if the observation effect is multiplied with more than one set of eyes watching.

(no subject)
posted by done on October 24th, 2008 1:24 AM

That is SCIENCE!

(no subject)
posted by Anna Louise on October 27th, 2008 2:52 AM

What an interesting conclusion!