PLAYERS TASKS PRAXIS TEAMS EVENTS
Username:Password:
New player? Sign Up Here
Levitating Potato
Level 3: 301 points
Alltime Score: 1751 points
Last Logged In: October 16th, 2024
TEAM: Societal Laboratorium TEAM: SCIENCE! TEAM: Lab Coats! TEAM: Level Zerø TEAM: Probot
highscore

retired
15 + 60 points

Gaint Paper Airplane by Levitating Potato

December 5th, 2007 2:46 PM

INSTRUCTIONS: Make a recognizably "huge" paper airplane. Document its successful flight.

The forces of the University claim to be assembling robots and bombs. Despite a lack of evidence that such robots exist, it is time the forces of Revolution began preparing for such an eventuality. People of the Revolution, I present to you:

The Revolutionary Air Force



Should this revolution come to bloodshed, rest assured that the forces of Revolution can maintain strategic control over the movement of forces and supplies, as well as gather valuable reconnaisance information.

Here I shall attempt to document this first aircraft of the RAF.

Opinions differ greatly on what the "rules" are for paper airplanes. I take a fairly purist approach. It should be paper, and only paper. It's not origami, so cutting is ok, but I don't like to use tape, glue, staples, paperclips, or other non-paper materials. Other materials dramatically change the game -- if I'm using glue, I might as well build a paper composite airplane, and that's far from the spirit of the Task. The need for tape or balance weights speaks to inadequacy of design, I believe.

I settled for a relatively modest definition of gaint -- I chose a 36" wingspan as my goal.

Several designs were tried and rejected before I settled on one I liked. Most designs based around a traditional letter-sized piece of paper run into problems because the wings get too floppy if you scale them up.

For paper, I used a relatively heavy brown mailing paper, purchased in roll form. Not because I think it's best (it's clearly not; something lighter would be better) but because it was easy to find. It didn't fold well because it was too stiff and thick, but it wasn't stiff enough to help with the wing strength issues meaningfully. Roll paper also presents another challenge -- the paper has a distinct curl to it, that can be very challenging to remove.

The design I ended up with is a simple high aspect ratio glider. It required two main modifications for the large size: the upturned wingtips are there to stiffen the wings, not for aesthetic or aerodynamic purposes (the cool look is an entirely incidental feature ;) ). The second was a truly gargantuan amount of up elevator, required because the forward section refused to lie flat. The forward section poking up creates a nose-down pitch moment and results in a diving flight into the ground; the elevator trim corrects this, but not without cost -- the glide performance of the final version is much reduced from its smaller cousin.

The glider was folded from a strip of paper 8"x36", cut lengthwise from the roll; the folds were performed such that the natural curl of the paper (still present after significant flattening attempts) curved the wingtips slightly up. The front was folded back along a line at 1", and this was repeated 4 times. Paper thickness and stiffness in folding thus resulted in an overall length of about 3.75". When the upturned winglets (1/2" on either side) are taken into account, the overall wingspan is 35" -- close enough to gaint for my purposes, I decided.

Without further rambling, what you've all been waiting for: the pictures.

- smaller

Gaint

Gaint

The gaint airplane barely fits in the construction hangar.


Flight

Flight

After extensive wind tunnel tests, a series of flight tests were conducted. Performance was deemed adequate, despite the marginal lateral stability seen here. (The airplane tends to bank to one side or the other in the presence of slight drafts -- more dihedral would help, but the paper isn't stiff enough.)


RAF

RAF

Wing markings proclaiming allegiance to the Revolutionary Air Force.


Design

Design

The original design. Taken from http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d2/ International_contest_paper_glider.svg



12 vote(s)



Terms

(none yet)

15 comment(s)

(no subject)
posted by The Revolutionary on December 5th, 2007 2:51 PM

Excellent work, Psychogeographer Potato!

(no subject)
posted by Levitating Potato on December 5th, 2007 3:16 PM

There's something broken with the way SF0 handles GIFs, I think. The full-size GIF is correct, but the scaled down version has the colors inverted. And for some reason it wouldn't let me just use the svg original.

enterprising indeed.
posted by Fonne Tayne on December 5th, 2007 3:17 PM

Unhappy is the fate of one who tries to win battles and succeed in attacks without cultivating the spirit of enterprise; for the result is waste of time and general stagnation.

(no subject)
posted by teucer on December 5th, 2007 3:17 PM

Props for not using any non-paper structurally.

Well done, comrade
posted by Flitworth on December 5th, 2007 4:22 PM

I, too, salute your purist approach.

Technical expertise
posted by Spidere on December 5th, 2007 5:22 PM

I love well-done technical terminology, especially when describing things such as paper airplanes.

(no subject)
posted by Sean Mahan on December 5th, 2007 5:34 PM

SVGs are now uploadable - they'll just show up as links to the file (scaling them to display properly embedded inline is a little too involved).

(no subject)
posted by Levitating Potato on December 5th, 2007 7:28 PM

Thank you all :)

Spidere -- What can I say, I'm an engineer :) To the best of my knowledge, all the technical stuff is correct. Perhaps not strictly necessary for paper airplane construction, but it's fun.

Sean -- thanks for the change :) Any clue what's going on with the GIF?

(no subject)
posted by Sean Mahan on December 5th, 2007 9:40 PM

It's the original gif's transparent background. PHP's gd functions (like imagecreatefromgif, the culprit here) are what we use for most image scaling type stuff, and they don't seem to preserve the allocation of a color as "transparent". So it ends up as black in the resized copy.

(no subject)
posted by Levitating Potato on December 5th, 2007 9:55 PM

That makes sense. And easy enough to work around. Thanks!

(no subject)
posted by Burn Unit on December 6th, 2007 10:07 AM

lovely wing design. like a flying razor.

(no subject)
posted by Fonne Tayne on December 6th, 2007 1:09 PM

like a stepping razor.

(no subject)
posted by Laura on December 10th, 2007 2:20 PM

Hey, the praxis was held by Humanitarian Crisis, not the University. Who's side are you on, anyway?

(no subject)
posted by EarthMaiden on December 14th, 2007 1:04 PM

Rockin :) What a great airplane!

(no subject)
posted by Levitating Potato on December 14th, 2007 8:31 PM

I wasn't trying to take over the praxis from HC, Laura -- just to do a good job on it, from a Revolutionary standpoint :)

The airplane was on the table when you were over, Emma -- though of course I forgot to point it out while we were busy getting ready to go tasking...