PLAYERS TASKS PRAXIS TEAMS EVENTS
Username:Password:
New player? Sign Up Here
Listener
Level 3: 319 points
Alltime Score: 796 points
Last Logged In: April 9th, 2010
TEAM: B0S TEAM: LØVE EquivalenZ Rank 1: User Society For Nihilistic Intent And Disruptive Efforts Rank 1: Anti


25 + 62 points

Proverb Proof by Listener, rongo rongo

October 31st, 2008 1:54 PM / Location: 42.3466,-71.11630

INSTRUCTIONS: Perform an experiment to verify or disprove a common proverb, when interpreted literally. Can you really catch more flies with honey than vinegar? How many more? Does a stitch in time really save nine? Or does it only save seven? Please note that aphorisms or non-metaphorical proverb-like sayings are not acceptable for this task.

A new broom sweeps clean. But which new broom sweeps cleanest? And do old brooms also sweep clean?

First, we identified a challenging sweeping task: Cleaning the dining room of rongo's local fraternity, where she lived during college. This is a challenging place to sweep because there are a lot of chairs and not that much space between tables. Plus, they could use a broom update. We selected three pairs of corresponding new and old brooms and put them to the test. The new brooms were purchased at Target and the old brooms were found on-site. (Approximately 4 years old, a Valentine's Day gift from local alums.)

We numbered the new brooms, and lettered the old ones correspondingly.
  • Brooms A and 1 were generic, synthetic, angle-cut brooms. Broom 1 cost $8.99.
  • Brooms B and 2 were somewhat more stylish synthetic brooms. Broom 2 had the special squeegee feature (lacking in Broom B) and cost $12.99.
  • Brooms C and 3 were corn brooms. Broom 3 cost $11.99.
In order to quantify sweeping success, we planted 10 lentils, 10 purple stars, and 10 blue beads under each table for each broom trial. The old brooms were used first, one per table. After the old broom trials, we counted the particles in the dust pan, and then we visually inspected the area under each table and attempted to recover any lentils, stars, or beads missed by the broom. We were able to find all the lentils by hand inspection, but not all the stars and beads. So for the new broom trials, we planted an additional 10 lentils, 10 stars, and 10 beads, marking the new set of beads and stars with a black Sharpie, so that if we swept up any beads or stars that remained on the floor from the old broom trials, we could differentiate them. It turned out that the bead sweeping part of the task was the most challenging, as all of the brooms were able to recover nearly all the lentils and stars.








Broombeadslentilsstars
A old21010
1 new3109
B old2910
2 new7 (+2 leftover)1010
C old6109
3 new9 (+4 leftover)99
Total old102929
Total new19 (+6 leftover)2928


The results demonstrated that (1) on average, new brooms do sweep cleaner than old brooms but old brooms are still pretty good for sweeping up lentil or star sized particles (2) corn brooms, whether new or old, perform somewhat better than synthetic brooms, particularly for the bead sized particles (3) the squeegee feature is probably useful. Rongo Rongo personally favors corn brooms, and has an old but not very worn out corn broom at home. Listener is leaning towards a squeegee enabled broom for his next personal sweeping tool purchase.

We tallied up the results, threw out the old brooms, and left the new brooms in the kitchen.


+ larger

New Brooms
Old Brooms
The broom testing arena
Basic synthetic angle brooms
Fancier synthetic brooms
Corn brooms
New and shiny brooms
Some fairly sad looking old brooms
A handful of particles
Counting out the particles before seeding the sweeping areas
Sweeping technique 1
Careful sweeping
Results for broom A
We carefully counted the particles after each trial
More dirt
Sweeping technique 2
Lots of particles
Tallying more results
Your average witch is going to prefer a corn broom

17 vote(s)



Terms

(none yet)

1 comment(s)

(no subject)
posted by done on October 31st, 2008 6:07 PM

I love this task.