PLAYERS TASKS PRAXIS TEAMS EVENTS
Username:Password:
New player? Sign Up Here
inquisitive dragonfly
Level 1: 10 points
Alltime Score: 540 points
Last Logged In: October 15th, 2008
TEAM: Run-of-the-mill taskers


retired

15 + 25 points

Reduction to the Body by inquisitive dragonfly

January 16th, 2008 4:26 PM

INSTRUCTIONS: Study your own body for at least 30 minutes straight and discover something you didn't know about before.

All one really has to do to find something about their body they didn't know before is take a picture of their back. Bumps, marks, discolorations - most people just don't look at their backs often enough to know anything about them. But then, who really wants to know? And who really wants to look at pictures of odd skin markings?

My inspiration for this project came from karate. When I first started going to my dojo, I would find myself barely capable of movement for days after each workout. I would bore all those around me with my remarks about discovering muscles I never knew I had, or that no-one should have to find out they had. Not too long ago I found a muscle on my leg that is involved in going down stairs but not up, because for a few days I was barely able to take a step down but could walk up four flights without a twinge.

In that line of thought, I decided that "studying" should be an entirely non-visual experience. After all, I don't have a microscope. Once visual examination is out, though, the options are limited. Taste seems disturbing, and entirely dependent on how recently I got out of the shower or left the dojo. Smell suffers similarly. The environment doesn't allow for listening to my body, beyond the already-known intestinal grumblings. This leave touch and kinesthetics.

The half hour was spent mostly still, occasionally stretching, eyes closed, attempting to find something discernible but not yet known. I recently discovered that a female family member has the ability to wiggle her ears, but assorted attempts to twitch new muscles groups into action failed miserably. I tried counting my vertebrae - not being a student of anatomy, I have no idea how many there are supposed to be - and only succeeded in learning that I'm not as flexible as I would like to be. Prodding around my mouth with the tongue found a few complaints for the dentist who inserted my most recent fillings, but fake enamel isn't quite "the body".

Around the time I was deciding either I knew way too much about my body or was simply too unobservant to notice anything new, I found one tidbit that fascinated the child inside: veins are three dimensional. I'm used to occasional flashes of blue on my wrists and hands, but fingering my wrists with my eyes closed found some unexpected bumps, which could be traced up the back of my hands. Not the tendons - I opened my eyes to check, and have spent far too much time examining that network of blue lines, investigating which position makes them most prominent (wrist bent down, hand relaxed) and which is most prominent even when I'm properly hydrated (left hand, running from base of the thumb up to the indentation between first and second knuckles).

The real question now is, can I convince myself not to spend hours upon end trying to trace veins across my entire body? The feet and ankles, at least, should be similarly prominent...

5 vote(s)



Terms

(none yet)

8 comment(s)

(no subject)
posted by Levitating Potato on January 16th, 2008 4:41 PM

I like the observation about just taking a photo of your back, but you're right -- this was more interesting.

Welcome to the game.

(no subject)
posted by Lincøln on January 16th, 2008 10:26 PM

But then, who really wants to know? And who really wants to look at pictures of odd skin markings?


I guess I do.

(no subject)
posted by susy derkins on January 16th, 2008 10:53 PM

Yeah, me too!
My first boyfriend´s back was great and he even let me squeeze the zits...

(no subject)
posted by GYØ Ben on January 17th, 2008 8:16 AM

Dear Lord.

(no subject)
posted by inquisitive dragonfly on January 17th, 2008 3:15 PM

Diana Wynne Jones' "Fire and Hemlock" gave me the comment about backs. A schoolgirl writes a story - something about offering to oil rippling muscles, I believe - to her crush, who attempts to dissuade her by returning a diatribe about the disgusting things that are to be found on backs. Squeezing zits may very well have been mentioned.

I can't remember if the book is any good, but those few pages have always stuck with me. Mostly because said letter is actually dictated to a third character, who adds a variety of comments about feeling entirely put off by the topic. I felt sorry for that character, but also gleeful that he'd been put in the situation.

(no subject)
posted by JTony Loves Brains on January 23rd, 2008 12:49 PM

The book actually is quite good. Not the best of her books, but by far not the worst either. I recommend any/all of her books to any/all who want a good read.

(no subject)
posted by JTony Loves Brains on January 23rd, 2008 12:56 PM

I like how the choice of exploration is not visual, but I'd love to see visible evidence of what you found. Truly, spending some time tracing the veins/arteries underneath on the surface of your skin with sharpies (red and blue?) would be mighty cool to see and would allow us to share better in your experience (this keyboard feels nothing like your calf or thigh, I'm sure).

(no subject)
posted by inquisitive dragonfly on January 25th, 2008 10:41 AM

I didn't want to take a picture of just some patch of skin to keep with the non-visual idea of the task (although I did think about putting a relatively small object next to one bit to demonstrate the three-dimensionality of the vein). The sharpie idea has potential, though...