PLAYERS TASKS PRAXIS TEAMS EVENTS
Username:Password:
New player? Sign Up Here
Teeth Beetles
Ecologist
Level 4: 399 points
Last Logged In: October 30th, 2009
BART Psychogeographical Association Rank 1: Commuter EquivalenZ Rank 1: User The University of Aesthematics Rank 1: Expert Biome Rank 2: Ecologist Chrononautic Exxon Rank 2: Futurist Society For Nihilistic Intent And Disruptive Efforts Rank 1: Anti
highscore

15 + 141 points

The Speed of Time by Teeth Beetles

February 18th, 2009 11:15 AM

INSTRUCTIONS: Accelerate or decelerate an aging process.

Insects and other ectotherms live their life cycles based on the ambient temperature. As such, they don't measure age in the same chronological way that endothermic animals (like humans) do. Their life cycle is measured in degree days, how much ambient energy they receive over a time period. Less ambient energy over a period of time, and they will age slower, more ambient energy over time, and they will age faster.

In this experiment I will demonstrate how increasing the temperature will accelerate the aging process of an insect.

I started off with 11 crickets which were roughly about 4 weeks old. At this stage, at about average room temperature, they reach maturity in 3 to 4 weeks. They were approximately a half an inch long, and as all insects in early life, have no wings or wing pads.

The system setup was as follows. The hot chamber was wrapped in aluminum foil, except for one facing, which was against a incandescent lamp. The cold chamber was simply immersed in water and ice, and placed away from direct sunlight. Inside there was gravel, a small cup of dog food, a tube from a paper towel roll, a piece of egg carton, and two cotton balls which would be moistened to provide water.

The crickets in the hot chamber tended to stay inside the cardboard tube, and hidden from view, whereas the cold chamber crickets tended to huddle together on to of the cardboard tube. During this period, one cricket from the cold chamber escaped, and one or two died, presumably from infection due to humidity. One cricket from the hot chamber died or escaped, but I never did find the body.

Three weeks later, I removed the crickets from their chambers, put them in plastic bags, and placed them in the refrigerator. This was to make the crickets less difficult to work with when documenting them. I placed them on a sheet of white paper and photographed them. The crickets from the cold chamber were still only about 1/2 to 3/4 of an inch long, with the exception of one individual, who was almost an inch long, and had wing pads. By contrast, the crickets in the hot chamber were all about one inch long, about half of them had wings and extended ovipositors, and the remaining excluding one had wing pads.

Afterwards I released all of them. I know releasing anything in the wild is generally a bad idea, but there are only females, no males.

- smaller

100_2466.JPG

100_2466.JPG

The setup, you can also see the crickets inside if you look closely. This was on day one, so they're almost identical.


100_2467.JPG

100_2467.JPG

Setup with foil on.


setup.jpg

setup.jpg

More early photos.


3weekslatercold.jpg

3weekslatercold.jpg

Note the small size of all but two of the crickets. Only the one furthest to the left had wing pads. Also, due to their small size, and consequently, their high surface area to volume ratio, these crickets recovered in seconds, and scattered. Good thing I took these photos outside...


3weekslaterhot.jpg

3weekslaterhot.jpg

Note the large size, and that roughly half of them have wings, which means they are in their final instar. Also, I figured out here (since the long ovipositors, or egg laying tubes only show up in vengeance in the last instar) that pet shops only sell female crickets. These are all around one inch long, twice to three times as long as the cold chamber ones.



33 vote(s)


Favorite of:


Terms

votelater, bugs, science, whywait

19 comment(s)

(no subject) +1
posted by Lincøln on February 18th, 2009 11:33 AM

SCIENCE!

(no subject)
posted by GYØ Ben on February 18th, 2009 12:27 PM

Steady, now.

(no subject)
posted by Jellybean of Thark on February 18th, 2009 12:54 PM

It'll hear you...

(no subject)
posted by teucer on February 18th, 2009 1:37 PM

SCIENCE!

(no subject) +1
posted by Morte on February 18th, 2009 2:04 PM

Why, Miss Yakamoto! You're beautiful!!

(no subject) +1
posted by Philippe on February 18th, 2009 6:17 PM

stand_back_square_0.png

(no subject)
posted by GYØ Vicki on February 19th, 2009 11:26 AM

Heh, I bought my friend Sam that t-shirt for his birthday =P, awesome praxis btw.

(no subject)
posted by GYØ Ben on February 19th, 2009 2:41 PM

:( want

(no subject) +1
posted by help im a bear on February 18th, 2009 1:03 PM

you should have kept the one who did well in the cold chamber alive and bred her with other crickets and repeated the experiment over and over to create a new breed of antarctic cricket!

(no subject)
posted by teucer on February 18th, 2009 1:37 PM

That would be pretty awesome.

(no subject)
posted by Jellybean of Thark on February 18th, 2009 2:28 PM

How do you know he didn't do just that?

(no subject)
posted by Minch on February 18th, 2009 1:17 PM

i vote, despite the fact that the term "only females" makes me wrinkle my nose in feminist ire.

(no subject)
posted by Levitating Potato on February 18th, 2009 1:29 PM

Unless I'm mistaken, it's a reference to Jurassic Park.

(no subject)
posted by Philippe on February 18th, 2009 6:15 PM

I interpreted it as a statement that it would be cruel or pointless to keep them in captivity because they had no way to reproduce.

(no subject) +1
posted by susy derkins on February 18th, 2009 5:04 PM

A ruler would have been neat, in the pics.

(no subject)
posted by Minch on February 19th, 2009 5:05 PM

i read this and instantly imagined a cricket with a crown... i realized a second later that you meant ruler to measure with...

but now i think the pictures would have been better with a theocratic or monocratic ruler too...

(no subject)
posted by susy derkins on February 22nd, 2009 11:03 AM

Gosh, you just made me miss the gummies :(

(no subject)
posted by rongo rongo on March 3rd, 2009 12:55 PM

This is very cool. I had no idea you could age insects through temperature.

(no subject)
posted by Wolf on September 27th, 2009 11:27 PM

Your praxises (praxii?) are really informative! Great experiment.