PLAYERS TASKS PRAXIS TEAMS EVENTS
Username:Password:
New player? Sign Up Here
Sean Mahan
Level 4: 566 points
Alltime Score: 5041 points
Last Logged In: June 25th, 2024
BADGE: Admin BADGE: Journey To The End Of The Night BADGE: The Sweet Cheat Gone TEAM: 761 Oak Street TEAM: San Francisco Zero TEAM: The Icepacks TEAM: LØVE TEAM: test team TEAM: Public Library Zero TEAM: INFØ TEAM: The Restored Images Team BART Psychogeographical Association Rank 1: Commuter EquivalenZ Rank 2: Human Googlebot The University of Aesthematics Rank 1: Expert Society For Nihilistic Intent And Disruptive Efforts Rank 2: Trickster
highscore

retired
15 + 105 points

Multi-Tasking by Sean Mahan

May 27th, 2007 9:08 PM

INSTRUCTIONS: Perform at least 3 tasks simultaneously.

Bubblesort's choice of task threw me off - I was mentally prepared to be assigned a task, and to work to do it as creatively and thoroughly as possible. But "Multi-tasking"? I, for one, am not much of a fan of such "meta-tasks" (the half-dozen or so player-submitted "Do some other group's task" (et al.) tasks suggest I may be alone in this, though). That said, a task is a task, and I don't think anyone wants a "duel" to consist of too much back-and-forth over the rules.

Going by ID's, at least, there are - or at least, have been - nearly 1200 tasks. There are a few near-duplicates in there, a few in-jokes, and more than a few that may never see the light of day, but it was still daunting to plot out a Multi-task.

I browsed through the active and deactivated "big lists", taking notes that I was trying to loosely group in potential collections of tasks. I had a couple of good threads going.

First, I considered a lengthy collection of grocery-store tasks. A properly-done I Was A Teenage Spokesmodel could involve The Player Commodity, Corporate Makeover, and Reverse Shoplifting. With the right product, altering the label could even take care of Everything That Exists Is On The Internet. Thank You The MGMT, Public Sign Makeover, Product Co-branding Photo Essay and Renew A Lost Art could've been worked in as well, without too too much trouble. Perhaps even some Tapes And Tapes, or Out With The Old could happen in the supermarket.

It felt a little unsatisfying, though; a bit un-duel-ish. Even if part of Multi-tasking is completing a ton of tasks at once, I felt more like I was trying to come up with tax exemptions than dueling someone. So I considered another option. Most San Franciscans know that, when the chips are down, you're alone, and you're facing an uphill epic battle, a good man to turn to is Frank Chu (yes, he has a wikipedia article). I've talked with Mr. Chu before about advertising, and with an event coming up, it would be a good time to Spread SF0. I could Compile Some Footage, perhaps Renew A Lost Art for the ad, or maybe even conduct the transaction with greeting cards. I'm sure there were other possibilities as well, but again, while a Frank Chu ad would've been great, I was concerned that I wouldn't be able to carry the full task(s) out over the weekend, and that Mr. Chu's significance would be easily missed anywhere his celebrity status has yet to reach.

I'm prone to analysis paralysis, and I prefer to deal with problems one at a time. I also wanted a big, impressive centerpiece task. So I turned to a character with a history of winning SFZero battles with a combination of cunning and pyrotechnics. No, I didn't ask Oliver for help. I just decided that a task he created, Erection, would be the perfect weapon with which to win this duel.

With that I could toss aside my trees of tasks and get down to business. Having recently succeeded in attaching a chair to my ceiling with little assistance, I assumed a tower would be within reach. This also seemed like a good time to fire up the ol' VMware and try to do something useful with SketchUp - persumably, using a tool dedicated to architectual design would make Tower-building almost foolproof! Check out the little person providing an idea of the scale.

SketchUp didn't really help much, since my real problem didn't seem to be in imagining a 30+ foot structure, but in contructing it quickly and cheaply by myself. I checked prices on wooded dowels, but decided they were too expensive (and a bit heavy all together). I considered copper (or some other metal) plumbing, but that failed on the same counts (but much worse). I wasn't sure there'd be much wiggle room for any assistance pulling the tower together. Furthermore, I was planning to Trespass installing the tower (the plan was to put it in either the wooded area or the parking lot between Oak St. and Fell St. just off Octavia Blvd. - where the Central Freeway ramp used to be). Based on price, the length available, and my own perception of its strength, I decided on PVC plumbing. It's light, it's very cheap, and the various links and joints make piecing the structure together relatively easy.

So I was off to a big box in Daly City to buy my tubes. I browsed the plumbing bits, looking for useful joints - among the best seemed to be a corner joint that would connect three pipes. Assuming I bought 12 lengths of 10' tubing, it could have 40' legs, meeting at right angles to each other...

I asked a Depot dork for some math help, or at least internet access, or at the very least, a calculator. No luck with any of them. I managed to blow enough of the cobwebs out of the trigonometry corner of my brain to determine the tower would end up being less than 30' tall, so I skipped the corner joint, bought the biggest keyring they had (to loop the tops of three legs together), and stuffed 120' of PVC into my hourly-rental Toyota Corolla.

Back at home, I started drilling holes in the tubes so that I could connect them to the keyring. I found an piece of cloth I'd bought some time ago, which would become an SFZero flag - the better to Spread SF0 with, natch. I figured I could even make a joke out of naming my construction The Sutro Tower.

With the flag's first coat drying, and the top three sections of tubing linked together to form a reasonably stable tower, I lugged some pipes downstairs to attempt the 20' version. And that's about where things started to go wrong.

First off, there's really no easy way - that I could figure out - to build a tower by yourself and without the aid of a crane, scaffolding, etc. I just leaned the collapsed tripod of the top section against something, popped an additional section of pipe onto each leg, and tried to convince it to stand up. At that height, the trees were a serious obstruction, and I was just using improvised anchors to keep the legs in place. I managed to hold it aloft for a bit, but "freestanding" was out of the question. As it turns out, once you have more than about 10' of PVC linked together, it starts acting much more like a twizzler than a steel girder.

So back to the laundry room / deck / workshop. This time I tried attaching a couple bits of metal and wood I had lying around as braces. Even the 10' tripod certainly felt more rigid. So back down again to add some length and try again. This time it was somewhat more stable, though still very difficult to manage alone. It's worth noting that, particularly in one's back yard, 20' suddenly looks very tall indeed, and 30'-40' seems almost impossibly tall.

I decided to take a break from tower wrangling to work on the flag a bit more. I considered my options. The lack of anchors, weights, etc was clearly a hindrance. I drilled a couple holes in a few "bottom" poles - I figured I could screw them into trees, bolt them onto some kind of anchor, or tie them to something. I had some heavy wire from the original version of the Take-Something-Leave-Something-Box. I drilled a couple more holes and tried using that wire as bracing for the tower - it helped, a little.

I'd hoped to finish the tower Saturday night, but by this point it was dark and my friends and roomies were all out Saturday night-ing (not that they could help - but a tower needs a witnesses). I decided to turn in and give it a go the next day.

I awoke with dread - the tower was built of half-cooked spaghetti, and while the bracing helped, I suspected that some aspect of my implementation was flawed - some combination of putting them at the wrong height (for their length) and not drilling bolt holes through the piping in quite the right direction.

I finished up the flag, and took another look at things. What I really needed was better bracing. Wood or metal loops? Maybe some of the old bicycle tires we had lying around? The extra bits of fence and deck wood the landlord stored in the yard? Maybe double loops of wire? Maybe try to straighten it instead of looping it in a (more aesthetically pleasing) circle?

The wire was, at this point, the only practically available option, but the problem with the tower thus far hadn't been the legs splaying wildly apart; it had been the soft, arced buckling the legs tended to do, which the wire would do little to prevent.

I'd considered tying a rope to the top to hoist the tower from our fire escape enough to make adding length easier. Faced with what was smelling increasingly of failure, I abandoned the trespassing / Octavia plan and walked up to Alamo Square Park to see if any of the trees seemed like they'd work to loop a rope over to pull up the tower. "Freestanding" it's not, but I figured I could anchor the legs carefully and then hope that letting go of the rope wouldn't send it tumbling down. I was encouraged enough to go buy some rope at Walgreen's (who knew?)

Given the instability of three 20' legs, though, I realized that I couldn't be optimistic about three 40' legs supporting the tower. More drilling, and I decided to add a fourth leg - with four 30' legs, I reasoned it'd be more stable, and I could add some kind of spire to make up for however much height it lacked - it worked for the Petronas Towers.

With Sam as my spotter / documenter and the neighbors watching confusedly on, I attached my rope tried to raise the four-legged, thirty-feet-at-best tower, now topped with an eye-catching flag. I tied the top to the fire escape, added the third pipe sections and went back up.

If 20' of PVC was like a Twizzler, then 30' - four legs or no - was like a guitar string. I hoisted, tied, tried spreading the legs around, and tried anchoring them to various pieces of the back yard, but all to no avail. Distaster.

In desperation, I screwed the rope to a baseball and ran back to Alamo to see if I could loop it over a sufficiently tall tree branch - and again failed.

So there you have it. First and foremost:

A Failure - not only that, a failure to get up an Erection! Is there any greater, any more tragic failure?

There's also the obligatory additions, since I don't think I really Spread SF0 with this attempt:

I took many a note - notes, incidentally, that will be of little use to you should you decide to build a tower.

Finally, there's:
Quite a bit of footage - much of it from early on, when I was brash, confident, and unaware of my impending downfall.




So, as it's already five after 9pm, I'd better finish up. I personally think this was a rather spectacular completion of The Failure, but that's hardly a duel-ish task. I haven't seen what Bubblesort posted yet, but I hope you'll be judicious in your voting, and vote for completions rather than people. I'm not sure what loosing this dare means - do I admit I'm a moron? - but we'll cross that bridge when we come to it.

+ larger

The highest the flag ever flew
Waving Majestically
P1020313.MOV
P1020314.MOV
P1020351.MOV
P1020348.MOV
P1020341.MOV
P1020340.MOV
P1020319.MOV
P1020317.MOV
towerdesign.png
P1020312.JPG
P1020318.JPG
P1020319.JPG
P1020321.JPG
P1020322.JPG
P1020323.JPG
P1020324.JPG
P1020325.JPG
P1020326.JPG
P1020327.JPG
P1020328.JPG
P1020329.JPG
P1020330.JPG
P1020331.JPG
P1020332.JPG
P1020333.JPG
P1020334.JPG
P1020335.JPG
P1020336.JPG
P1020339.JPG
P1020342.JPG
P1020344.JPG
P1020348.JPG
P1020349.JPG
Notes

21 vote(s)



Terms

everyoneshouldsee

23 comment(s)

(no subject)
posted by Darkaardvark on May 27th, 2007 10:08 PM

Sorry, you'll get no help from me deciding this showdown.

Sean, your completion excelled in its organization, clean and clear documentation, and willingness to own up to its failure.

However, I would've liked to see more fire.

(no subject)
posted by Lizard Boy on May 28th, 2007 8:20 AM

Hehe, the smear campaign didn't make any sense until I heard the bush accent.

I'm with Darkaardvark on this one. Both of these tasks are certainly vote worthy, and neither really OUTDID the other I think, in that they both excelled in different areas.

And Sean? Shorter lengths, my dear, shorter lengths.

(no subject)
posted by Møuse on May 28th, 2007 8:28 AM

I must say I am swayed to vote this side regardless of the defeatest attitude you have taken which is to be expected after such a huge plan starts to sink faster than the titanic.

I am first of all impelled by the spirit of the tasks undertaken. Positive, Creative, Large Scale and External. I am not a fan of tasks that induce negativity between players, in character or not. Not in a prudish manner mind you, I always enjoy a good sticking it to the man, but this is not the spirit of play for me. I also am an advocate of tasks that take you away from your habitat.

Secondly I am a sucker for good documentation. For me the submittion of a task is to share, inspire, and then above all else, tell a damn good story that might fall into myth and be told around campfires when we finally run out of oil (burnunit seems to be the man to see about this by the way). It is doubly important for me as i have grown up in the sf0 world without other players nearby. Simply without proper documentation it does not exist in my world.

Thirdly (yes it could possibly grow into a long list), there is a huge chord that is struck inside me when a big plan goes wrong. It is of course truly compelling and moving to see one mans plight against insurmountable odds, but also for myself in the current year, almost every big plan and venture i have gone on has gone horribly wrong at many places. Misery enjoys company of course, but often fantastic things come out of the chaos of failure. (Annoyingly the defeatest mentality that is created in its original designer can stop them from appreciating the fantastic).

Onwards and upwards!
..Or bending and sideways!

Good show to both of you!

We had the same problems with metal.
posted by Ink Tea on May 28th, 2007 9:15 AM

Oddly, you're not the first to have failed at getting an erection. Poor Olly failed night after night, even with the assistance of a cute girl.

On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:14:19PM -0500, Ink Tea wrote:

On Jun 10, 2006, at 11:46 AM, Oliver Xymoron wrote:

On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:54:19AM -0500, Ink Tea wrote:
I'm resisting with all my might, posting about how you were so
excited,
but in the end couldn't get it up.

You have to save all that innuendo up for the task description.


There are no worries of running dry. I have an untapped well of
innuendo.

I've no doubt. Have fun with this:

Went to the hardware store again tonight to look for new couplings. I
was hoping to find something that would fit snugly over my conduit
like a sleeve. No luck.

Now I'm thinking that I should join it similar to the way S4's dome is
built - flatten the ends, drill holes, and screw everything together
with nuts and bolts. Much less fiddly and more rigid.

Unfortunately S4 doesn't know where his giant vice is and doesn't have
a drill press any more. He does have a barrel of lube though. Know
anyone with a good tool collection?




DSC00031.JPG

(no subject)
posted by Sean Mahan on May 28th, 2007 11:59 AM

Well, it's nice to be in good company! Obviously, I need to do something with my pile of failure tubes. I was considering the world's deadliest Play Structure, but I'd really like to get that tower up. Incidentally, the parts for it were less than $25, which seems like it'd almost have to be a record if it ends up being > 30' high.

(no subject)
posted by Cameron on May 28th, 2007 9:34 PM

Minor edge gained by great documentation.

I also have habored hopes of achieving Erection. Le Sigh.

Shame to see PVC does not hold it's shape... Back to the drawing board.

A memorial memory for sure
posted by the band-aid bandit on May 28th, 2007 10:32 PM

well interesting way to spend memorial weekend. I bet my friend Andybot would have some ideas about making that tower stand. He's built structures for Burning and the such. His friend Ben is also pretty handy and would have ideas.

PVC's a bitch
posted by Brandon Sarzynski on May 28th, 2007 10:46 PM

Shame the tower didn't work, woulda been cool. From prior create something for less than one costs projects, I could have told you PVC is a bitch. It never does what you envision it doing. I reccomend sticking to WD40 and Duct tape if you envision something in a hardware store actually working just right without professional help.

(no subject)
posted by Ian Kizu-Blair on May 29th, 2007 11:15 AM

Wonderful insight into the world of Oliver.

(no subject)
posted by Burn Unit on May 29th, 2007 1:00 PM

"Billy Idol live version or something. I don't know if that's going to help me or hurt me."

"You need those proteins for strength" (upside down chair in background) "and b vitamins for energy."

Haaa!

And the look on your face "basically I have 3 hours 20 minutes left" was so achingly sincerely sad for a brief moment.

I think I might have gone the supermarket route myself.

(no subject)
posted by Phishman on May 29th, 2007 2:45 PM

simply genius!

(no subject)
posted by Brandon Sarzynski on May 29th, 2007 7:13 PM

Why so many votes when he didn't even succeed? Is this a popularity contest? Are you all missing the point? Oh well, your bad. He did go big, but he fell flat. If you guys want new players to stick around longer than a week, how bout you follow the rules.

(no subject)
posted by Lizard Boy on May 29th, 2007 7:50 PM

Uh, the rules...last I checked "the failure" was a task.

Anyway, I don't think the point is success to the letter. I think it's doing things you wouldn't have done otherwise, broadening your horizons, and giving the other folk at SF0 something interesting to read about.

(no subject)
posted by Burn Unit on May 29th, 2007 8:01 PM

Yeah, dude, poor form. In case you didn't want to look for it here's a link to The Failure.

I win. Pay up.
posted by Bubblesort's Ghost on May 30th, 2007 9:26 PM

I'm just back to collect my winnings. It's 12:12 here in Eastern Standard Time and I won by 3 votes. You owe me some satisfaction, Sean.

We discussed on your task thread briefly what satisfaction might mean. Since then I did some research and it turns out that satisfaction is when I'm satisfied. See The Princeton Dictionary.

You know what would satisfy me, Sean? If you did your job. Let me explain what I mean by that:

1. Clearly document how the peer moderation works in this game.
2. Set up some form of procedure to stop one collaborator from denying other collaborators credit for work that they have done. Perhaps some kind of judicial thing. I don't know. Whatever you set up it needs to put a big red X on this task or else whatever you created does not create justice.
3. Respect the players enough to respond to emails from them.

I'll stop back in a week to check on your progress. I hope that you will make good on your promise of satisfaction.

(no subject)
posted by Sean Mahan on May 30th, 2007 10:28 PM

THATS IT. I QUIT SFZERO.

(congrats! if we ever meet, I'll shake your hand and possibly even give you a greeting card)

(no subject)
posted by Ziggy C. on May 30th, 2007 10:55 PM

Now that the duel is over, I feel this does deserve a vote.

Yup!
posted by Cthulhu Kitty on May 30th, 2007 10:59 PM

I concur.

Beat at your own game…
posted by Blue on May 31st, 2007 2:04 AM

Beat at your own game thats got to hurt love!

Quitters never WIN
posted by Burn Unit on May 31st, 2007 8:33 AM

You can't quit, you have a job to do. A job damn you! Get back to those servers and do your job, task monkey, make us some justice as from heaven above and that right soon!

glasnost! glasnost! glasnost!

(no subject)
posted by Lizard Boy on May 31st, 2007 1:42 PM

=(

Don't let one guy get you down Sean. Remember that there are still those of us here that appreciate that you're human too. You just don't notice us as much because we're not making demands on you all the time...

(no subject)
posted by Darkaardvark on May 31st, 2007 3:33 PM

mouseover it...

(no subject)
posted by Lizard Boy on May 31st, 2007 3:35 PM

Oh dude, I really should learn HTML. (My comments still stand though, except maybe the frownie face)

Edit: "View Source" is useful.

Edit Edit: But not useful enough it seems.