PLAYERS TASKS PRAXIS TEAMS EVENTS
Username:Password:
New player? Sign Up Here
Darkaardvark
Level 4: 485 points
Alltime Score: 5738 points
Last Logged In: January 2nd, 2025
BADGE: Senator BADGE: INTERREGNUM TEAM: Societal Laboratorium TEAM: MNZero TEAM: Group Creation Public Badge TEAM: Bastion of Backgammon TEAM: SFØ Podcast TEAM: Run-of-the-mill taskers TEAM: MATHEMATICS TEAM: HUMANITIES, ART and LANGUAGE! TEAM: LØVE TEAM: Game of Deception TEAM: BDL - the broccoli defamation league TEAM: Probot TEAM: Public Library Zero TEAM: SF0 Skypeness! TEAM: INFØ TEAM: FLUMMØX TEAM: Silly Hats Only TEAM: SFØ Foreign Legion TEAM: team cøøking! EquivalenZ Rank 1: User The University of Aesthematics Rank 1: Expert

Darkaardvark / Texts

Order by: date ↑ - rating ↓
posted by Darkaardvark on September 22nd, 2008 4:38 PM

Bah, there was no reason to unsubmit and resubmit for the free points, especially since you knew you wouldn't have finished posting it by last era.

posted by Darkaardvark on May 29th, 2008 6:40 PM

This is ridiculously easy as written and shouldn't be worth any points as written.

posted by Darkaardvark on May 14th, 2008 3:19 PM

C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER

posted by Darkaardvark on February 19th, 2008 6:05 PM

Vote for going back over a praxis and making it better.

posted by Darkaardvark on March 29th, 2008 10:29 PM

You can find it here. Obviously that link is specific to this week, but you can find the main link on the Onion's AV Club main page.

posted by Darkaardvark on March 30th, 2008 9:34 AM

That's a good question, and one that's relevant to probably more than just this task. I think 'lawl i totally called teh fact taht (sports team) wud win (sports championship)' is certainly not enough.

The nice thing is, considering this is a 250-point task, I don't think there are many players at that level who would go to great lengths to lie about a task completion. So I would say, something with a datestamp on it, or other dated proof would be sufficient to me, though I don't know about sf0 at large.

Burn Unit: Do you consider the task to be making the prophecy? If you do, then that would be a retroactive completion. I guess it's a matter of opinion. I'd say only prophecies made from this point forward count.

posted by Darkaardvark on March 30th, 2008 9:58 AM

Read Sean's comment here: http://sf0.org/Lincoln/taskDetail/?id=2353

posted by Darkaardvark on March 30th, 2008 11:55 AM

I think it depends on the context of the prediction. So if you're predicting that Mike Gravel will be the Democratic nominee in 2008, you're allowed to vote for him... but if your prophecy is "I predict a horde of zombies will tear through downtown San Francisco [not a good prophecy, actually, too likely]" you're not allowed to go and organize a zombie flash-mob. In short, probably not.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 53 Next >>