PLAYERS TASKS PRAXIS TEAMS EVENTS
Username:Password:
New player? Sign Up Here
Exxon Mobil
Level 1: 10 points
Last Logged In: July 21st, 2007
highscore

retired

0 points

Secrets Secrets by Exxon Mobil, Bob, Praxis, SF0 Police, The Big Red X, Fanny Pants, The it, Lyle Hamilton, SFØ, Plastic Jesus, Populace Junky, FIFA Sport, Red Vic, Bookmobot, AIDS, Dr. Hawkins, Everyday Joe, Zhee Meatss Needz Cheffing, Major B, Ricky Ricardo, ACME Detective, VILE Agent, Scienceguru, Alouette, Chaos Theory, Sock Puppets Unite!, The Orange Flag, Oswald the Monkey, Insert Witty Name, Sutro Tower, Dok's Sock, Squibbs, Poncho, Lola, Labyrinth Dog, Bob, Ted Logan, bill s. preston esq., Death (the Bassist), Your PinUp, The Fuzz, yoko ono, Eidolon, Jack, o f, all, trades, master, o', none, Westley, Samantha, Inigo Montoya, Turk Fezzik, Vizzini Siciliano, Prince Humperdinck, Six-Fingered Man, boogaloo stuie, The Pweist, kieran udon, Dread Pirate Roberts, Nietzche, Derrida, Aristotle, Heidegger, Guy Debord, Plato, Socrates, Kierkegaard, Marx, Hegel, Kant, Hume, Locke, Confucius, Spinoza, Hobbes, Descarte, Rousseau, Malebranche, Leibniz, Schopenhauer, St. Aquinas, Bentham, Jesus, Mill, St. Augustine, Buddha, Bush 1, Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Fox NEws News, Halliburton, Donald Rumsfeld, Diebold Elect Systms, Big Oil, ChevronTexaco Texaco, Anthony Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, William Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Condoleezza Rice, SAIC, BillOreilly Oreilly, Compassionate Conservatism, UPS, AT&T, Microsoft Corporation, altria, For the Cheat, The Villain, Rubin Starset, ENØ Sock, Andrew Ryan, Taco Bell, mary magdalen

June 24th, 2008 1:05 PM

INSTRUCTIONS: Create a secret society.

Lola says:

sockpuppet58079.jpg

Regrouping here. We can be heroes, you know...



- smaller

Secrets Secrets

Secrets Secrets



10 vote(s)



Favorite of:


Terms

(none yet)

67 comment(s)

(no subject) +2
posted by GYØ Ben on June 24th, 2008 5:18 AM

I can't believe I didn't see this coming.

(no subject) +2
posted by Flea on June 24th, 2008 5:56 AM

D=

(no subject) +2
posted by Dax Tran-Caffee on June 24th, 2008 6:41 AM

this is not good. what do we do?

what are your demands??!?!

(no subject) +2
posted by Minch on June 24th, 2008 7:32 AM

uhm.... is it still a secret "society" when the majority of the members are one person's sock puppets?

The proof was un-submitted +2
posted by SF0 Daemon on June 24th, 2008 9:55 AM

This proof was un-submitted - any comments before this one are from before the un-submit.

(no subject) +1
posted by Sparrows Fall on June 24th, 2008 11:14 AM

One hundred sixteen collaborators.

One hundred sixteen.

(no subject) +2
posted by Darkaardvark on June 24th, 2008 11:29 AM

Even from sockpuppets, is this worth doling out 14,500 points?

(no subject) +1
posted by Sparrows Fall on June 24th, 2008 11:47 AM

Does it matter, if it's not to 'real' people? I doubt a sockpuppet's going to make it to the front page.

Except JJason, of course.

(no subject)
posted by Tøm on June 24th, 2008 11:59 AM

Scared of the puppets?

haaa! +3
posted by Burn Unit on June 24th, 2008 12:28 PM

that's so hilarious. because, you know, there's such a limited number of points to dole out. and it's a lot of work for the system to manufacture and ship them for just in time delivery when you hit the "submit proof" button. And it's going to stay here, on the first page of the praxis for so long that we really must be admired for suffering through it. If only someone would give us relief

(no subject) +4
posted by Darkaardvark on June 24th, 2008 8:16 PM

Geez, Mr. Unit, I'm surprised at you--- wait, a minute. Something's not ringing right here. When you go to sf0.org/pointvault , do you just see a 404? I figured you'd done the secret challenge to unlock the vault...

There are exactly 241,305 points remaining in the vault. Each praxis, each vote, they all take points out of the vault. And when they're gone, they're gone. I've heard that Sean Sam and Ian are working hard on manufacturing a renewable alternative to points, but for now, we need to use this dwindling resource wisely.

Because, don't you get it?? Once we're all out of points, we won't be ALLOWED to task anymore.

(no subject) +2
posted by Lincøln on June 24th, 2008 12:05 PM

I'll tell you what, I respect these sockpuppets more than The Beleaguered.

And I believe they have a secret.

(no subject) +4
posted by Rainy on June 24th, 2008 12:15 PM

Socks are much friendlier seeming than murderers.

(no subject) +1
posted by Minch on June 24th, 2008 12:27 PM

they're only secret is who is controlling them... and for some, that's not even a secret.

The proof was un-submitted +1
posted by SF0 Daemon on June 24th, 2008 12:38 PM

This proof was un-submitted - any comments before this one are from before the un-submit.

(no subject) +2
posted by Minch on June 24th, 2008 2:11 PM

wait. is this just going to be perpetually un-submitted|re-submitted to keep it on the front of the praxis board...


that's slightly annoying

yeah but our annoyance has an expiration date
posted by Burn Unit on June 24th, 2008 2:42 PM

they only get a few unsubmits

(no subject) +1
posted by SNORLAX on June 24th, 2008 2:49 PM

the 2nd time was my fault. i didn't want me or my sockpuppet to have anything to do with this one. so i had to unsubmit it and drop it.

(no subject)
posted by Minch on June 24th, 2008 2:57 PM

I am glad you and your sockpuppet have higher standards than this.

(no subject)
posted by Burn Unit on June 24th, 2008 3:34 PM

boo to sockpuppet elitism. BOOO I SAY LOUDLY.

(no subject) +4
posted by bigglesworth on June 24th, 2008 4:41 PM

GOD DAMMIT

I'M GONNA BITE YOU TOO!

(no subject) +2
posted by Fonne Tayne on June 24th, 2008 4:46 PM

bigglesworth... why are you never so loud in real life?

(no subject) +1
posted by .thatskarobot on June 24th, 2008 2:15 PM

Down with that which we do not understand!

WTF!!???
posted by susy derkins on June 24th, 2008 8:04 PM

Wow, Ben Forbes is corresponding authour here?? Last name on the list.
And now he has another fleur...
Man what

EDIT: Now he has another Flag!

(no subject)
posted by JJason Recognition on June 24th, 2008 8:24 PM

Ben is cheater.

The Big Red X
posted by SF0 Daemon on June 24th, 2008 8:18 PM

This proof has been flagged by 6 of your fellow players (for the benefit of all, flags are anonymous). As such, it has been automatically disapproved. Most likely, they've posted comments explaining why they're displeased. If you think you may be the victim of a bug, injustice, or a gang of Rubins, hit up the contact page.

(no subject)
posted by JJason Recognition on June 24th, 2008 8:23 PM

Boo! This is awesome! Who flagged this? Own up!

(no subject) +1
posted by Minch on June 24th, 2008 8:24 PM

I'll own up. It's a sockpuppet army, most of whom belong to the same person. AND they keep resubmitting the damn thing. I'll proudly admit I flagged, I'll even admit I was apparently the final flag that killed it.

(no subject)
posted by The it on June 24th, 2008 8:25 PM

Boo indeed!

These sockpuppets belong to a wide range of players.

(no subject) +2
posted by Minch on June 24th, 2008 8:49 PM

boo me and negative comment vote me all you want. at least i am owning up to flagging it. frankly i don't think it's a very impressive completion. i am allowed that opinion. and i am not the only one who thinks so or it wouldn't have gotten the big red x. i am just one person, with one flag, you need 6 for the x.

(no subject)
posted by susy derkins on June 24th, 2008 8:54 PM

You flagged Ben too then.

(no subject) +3
posted by Minch on June 24th, 2008 9:17 PM

Flagging does not reflect my lack of adoration for a player or a person... it is simply a reflection of my opinion on a task. Ben knows I love him. I doubt he doubts that, ever.

(no subject) +1
posted by Spidere on June 24th, 2008 10:36 PM

I also flagged. It doesn't seem like a completion that met the requirements, and felt more like a few people trying to game the system than an impressive praxis.

(no subject) +2
posted by Blue on June 25th, 2008 12:45 AM

playground.jpg

(no subject)
posted by GYØ Ben on June 25th, 2008 3:40 AM

Right, before you, you and you start accusing me left, right and centre of being involved in this, I have no idea what is going on, and I did not add myself to this shite completion. I flagged it as well.

(no subject)
posted by Minch on June 25th, 2008 9:24 AM

whoa there kitten, i did not accuse you of anything. i didn't even know you were a part of the task till susy pointed out i flagged you... after which point you will notice the "Ben knows I love him" comment.

simmer down

(no subject) +2
posted by susy derkins on June 25th, 2008 11:58 AM

I should stop following puzzles.
I just manwhatted about the fact, but whatever.

(no subject)
posted by Minch on June 25th, 2008 12:10 PM

Susy, I think the murders have people a little jumpy.
I still adore you

(no subject) +1
posted by Burn Unit on July 1st, 2008 9:37 AM

NEW WORD VERBATION ALERT !

(no subject)
posted by susy derkins on July 1st, 2008 9:50 AM

uh?

(no subject) +2
posted by GYØ Ben on July 1st, 2008 12:43 PM

to manwhat (v) [manwhatting, manwhatted]

to be confused with the intent or nature of a phenomenon, to the point of speechlessness

(no subject) +14
posted by Mayor of Claycord on June 24th, 2008 9:44 PM

ONE HUNDRED SIXTEEN SOCKPUPPETS AND I WAS NOT INVITED?

YOU ARE LESSER SOCKPUPPETS.

WE ALL KNOW EVERYONE LIKES THE MAYOR MORE THAN YOU.

(no subject)
posted by Bob on June 25th, 2008 12:45 PM

The rest of us just happen to know that you're already planning a completion of this task...

(no subject) +2
posted by Minch on June 25th, 2008 12:33 PM

Oh Lola, how I love thee... shall I count the ways?

your supple feathers

your clicking claws on the linoleum

your buckin’ sass


pretty much all win. all the time.

(no subject) +2
posted by Bex. on June 26th, 2008 1:55 AM

Gaddamnit.

(no subject)
posted by Tøm on June 25th, 2008 12:41 PM

Rubin?!

(no subject)
posted by Bob on June 25th, 2008 12:46 PM

I had no idea Lola was so...
Mean.



I like it.

(no subject)
posted by Lola on June 25th, 2008 12:56 PM

Mean??

main_buckyou58080.jpg

I don't know what the buck you're clucking about.
I like to bacAACk, call it exercising my right to BUCK fair and consensual collaborUCKation.

(no subject) +3
posted by SNORLAX on June 25th, 2008 2:03 PM

lets collaborate on some BBQ

rec_brined_whole_chicken_lg.jpg

(no subject)
posted by Blue on June 25th, 2008 3:08 PM

Seconded!
Collaborative enjoyment of BBQ! is loooooong overdue!

(no subject)
posted by Minch on June 25th, 2008 3:24 PM

BBQ I would glady vote for (and eat)!

(no subject)
posted by teucer on July 1st, 2008 9:15 AM

But... that's obviously roast chicken!

Not that I wouldn't love to collaborate on roast chicken; it's tasty stuff. Sadly I left my best roast chicken recipe in North Carolina...

(no subject)
posted by teucer on July 31st, 2008 9:52 PM

Being at present in North Carolina, I offer the following:

one 5-lb chicken, giblets removed
Salt and freshly ground pepper
1 clove garlic, peeled
1 bay leaf
several sprigs fresh thyme (or 1/2 teaspoon dried)
2 tablespoons unsalted butter, softened
1 tablespoon vegetable oil

Preheat the oven to 425. Rinse the chicken inside and out under cold running water. Dry with paper towels. Season the cavity with salt and pepper and then add the garlic and herbs.

Truss the chicken with kitchen twine. [ed note: this is followed by a paragraph on how to do so, which refers to photos in the back of the book.]

Rub the chicken with the butter and oil and season with salt and pepper. Place the chicken on its side in a roasting pan just large enough to hold it and roast 20 minutes. Turn the chicken on its other side and roast 20 minutes longer. Finally, turn the chicken breast side up, add 1/2 cup water to the pan, and continue roasting until the juices run clear when the thigh is pierced with a skewer, 20 to 30 minutes longer. Transfer the chicken to a platter and let rest for at least 15 minutes after removing from the oven, covered with aluminum foil. The juices will be absorbed into the meat and carving will be easier.

While the chicken is resting, spoon off the fat in the roasting pan. Bring the remaining juices to a boil on to p of the stove, scraping with a whisk to release any cooked particles t hat adhere to the bottom of the pan. Reduce the heat to medium and simmer the juices until reduced by one third; strain.

To serve, remove the trussing twine from the chicken. Pour some of the reduced juices over the chicken and serve the remainder in a sauce-boat on the side.

(By the way, the above comes from Le Cordon Bleu At Home, which is a cookbook arranged as a series of lessons, each of which is a complete meal that takes about a weekend to get ready for and cook. This absolutely divine roast chicken is the main dish from lesson one.)

(no subject) +2
posted by Peter Garnett on June 25th, 2008 2:16 PM

Honestly, I would have been content to just see the task sit here with no votes forever - it feels like a completion, just not an extraordinary completion. And since sockpuppets receive 200 points simply for being sockpuppets I didn't think the baseline 125 pts would be an issue.

That's just me though.

(no subject)
posted by ENØ Sock on June 29th, 2008 11:57 PM

how the hell did i colaberate with this?

(no subject)
posted by Flea on July 1st, 2008 5:35 AM

Because collaboration is the choice of the current collaborators. The person being drafted doesn't have a say in it.

This may need to change...

(no subject)
posted by GYØ Ben on July 1st, 2008 5:47 AM

Yes. For now, Sock, you've got a permanent flag on your profile.

(no subject)
posted by Sean Mahan on July 1st, 2008 9:07 AM

hrmm.

(no subject) +1
posted by teucer on July 1st, 2008 8:10 AM

Vote for involving EN0 Sock.

Since, y'know, he's not one.

(no subject) +2
posted by Puddin' Head on July 31st, 2008 7:09 PM

I am no sockpuppet, you bastards.

(no subject) +2
posted by Not Here No More on July 31st, 2008 8:41 PM

Puddin' Head, your language will be excused in favor of extreme cuteness.

(no subject) +1
posted by Peter Garnett on July 31st, 2008 9:25 PM

One interesting result of this praxis is that people can't use sockpuppets to fulfill the 100 player minimum anymore.

(no subject)
posted by Jellybean of Thark on July 31st, 2008 10:55 PM

That almost sounds like a challenge.

(no subject)
posted by Meta tron on August 20th, 2008 6:46 PM

Aw crap, my puppets in there too :S

Really should pay more attention.

(no subject)
posted by JJason Recognition on August 20th, 2008 7:10 PM

Every time somebody comments on this task, the huge list of participants shows up in my Friend's Comments section. It really is freakin huge.

I'm not complaining, mind you.

(no subject)
posted by Dax Tran-Caffee on August 20th, 2008 7:46 PM

I am. And here's another comment to make it happen again.

(no subject)
posted by The Big Red X on September 4th, 2008 12:15 AM

OM NOM NOM!!