Hanging with Adam & Eve by susy derkins
September 30th, 2008 12:56 AMI decided to commit my own original sin, one of disobedience to the powers that be, by way of coining my own SF0 currency and renouncing the vote system. Non-confrontational disobedience. A creative way to play around the restrictive structures, but still an instance of taking the reins in one hand and the machete in the other.
But first,
Gratuitous musing/bitching, which is also sinful, but definitely not original (whining is #49 of the 70 major sins in Islam) 100% skippable, though.
The new rules might be all right considering that this is Everyday Life after all, and, you see, that´s exactly how it is in lowercase everyday life: you get to do a considerable amount of useless stuff you don´t really want to do for the privilege to get a number of arbitrary pieces of paper or metal or bytes that you can then choose to use for doing good/significant/meaningful things. Or to give to others.
BUT. I am fed up, you hear?, fed up with meekingly going along with rules that delay what I can actually do that doesn´t totally suck. In lowercase everyday life, of course.
AND. Since this is an interface, a new representation for the data that's already there, well, I can start reacting here, changing the code here, so it will trickle down into the lowercase mirror.
"But-but it is their game and if you don´t like it you don´t have to play. The door, you see, is wide open.." Of course it´s their game and they get to make and change the rules. So familiar. The means of production. If you don´t like it you can go, we need the room, you know?
So, the currency? Is a virtual Pancho Villa peso, with the Phrygian cap that shines, freedom radiating all around.

It has the admiration value of regular full-size vote. It is designed to be deposited in a comment box (I am not smart enough to figure a way to place it elsewhere) in what I consider a deserving praxis.
OK, now. As pretty as my Villa pesos could be, I am afraid they ´ll do squat for anyone´s score: an idle symbol, tokens from a tantrum, they are doomed to stir some smiles and/or rolling eyes, at best***.
(Which actually works in my favor in the context of this task. See, sin in classical Greek is hamartia (ἁμαρτία), "to miss the mark", as in archery. Which is just what I am doing here. Trying but not quite getting there. So, sinning allright. And the sin committed also fulfills the criteria for the worst kind of Jewish sins: Pesha, an intentional sin; an action committed in deliberate defiance of God (aka as SSI in these lands).
Finally, I claim that coining your own currency is original in the sense that is not committed as often as it should.
I hope those are enough technicalities to keep the flags away).
And now for some practical consequences
Starting now, I´ll be voting with virtual Pancho Villa pesos (VPVPs) only, so I don´t have to worry about not having enough till the end of the week/month/Era.
Yep, I, the ultimate vote-monkey, am giving up official voting altogether, renouncing to that part of the SFØ formal economy. And I plead you all to consider me out of it on the other side too: DON´T YOU VOTE FOR MY TASKS! IT WOULD ONLY DRAIN VOTE-POINTS!
***But I will be setting up a VOTE-POINT PIGGIE BANK (I intend to task quite a bit this Era, what with getting MXØ off the ground and all) from which emergency votes could be donated to friends that find themselves voteless in front of an awesome praxis. Maybe the VPVPs will become handy there, somehow. Maybe trading votes for lateral task exchanges. Or something. The informal economy rules.
UPDATE: The VOTE-POINT PIGGIE BANKis ready to give vote-points to the bearers of virtual Pancho Villa pesos (VPVP). Send me a message stating which completion do you want to vote for and how many points do you want to award. There are currently 147 in the vault, so let's put them to good use.
(And is not that I'm going to be very strict with the VPVPs either: if you want some vote-points drop me a line, I have some). Sorta like the guys throwing dollar bill airplanes.
LAST UPDATE: Nah, my idea of a votepoint give away is a failure. I guess it goes against the whole spirit of voting: stamping one's player picture at the bottom of something we liked. But since no one really cares if I said I wasn't going to vote this Era I am deciding that I won't care either, so I'll distribute my votepoints among the task that I had given VPVPs to. But should I do that now or at the end of the Era? I suck at money choices too.
4 vote(s)
Favorite of:
Terms
whystartexplainingmyvotesnow, brilliant33 comment(s)
(no subject)
+3

This is the absolute best thing to find in one´s comments box. Thanks!
I don't mean to offend, but had I the points, I would vote for this completion, Ms. Derkins. It's pretty brilliant.
To that end, I award you this bee:

Googly eyed among the emergency sprinklers! Thanks, sir. I have never had one like it.
Well I would vote, but that would defeat the whole point of this praxis.
Please accept this instead:

I would lyk ur macro better if it was a kitteh. :)
Yeah, but a kitty of approval just doesn't have the same ring...
I just *now* got it. Thanks, Adam, sir.
well, i was going to vote for this, to commit my own original sin. but instead,
i award you this here igloo.
i vote for this task (which i love) by giving you POINTS.

points from a 3 fingered hand.
Wow, look at all the amazing stuff I got!
You guys are great and brilliant and I am very very happy now.
Thanks!
From Emperor Norton himself!! Way better than a broken link, I must say.
Thanks!
Nooooooo!!!!
Now I'm using the same thing as someone else and I didn't even mean to...
What was wrong with the Commitee of Vigilance seal?
I like this completion just as much as I like the new voting system. (Which is to say, a lot. I like them both a lot.)
You mean the new voting system or the new voting system?
Ah. Yeah, I guess that was ambiguous. I meant the officially certified, administrator-approved, press-the-button system that the powers have forced upon us.
As I task a little more and gain a few more points, my inclination is to vote where I previously gave a derkins. This means I would be using my derkins much like the "votelater" term, kind of as a bookmark. I don't want to withhold votes from fellow players, since my understanding is that receiving votes gives one both more points and more votes to bestow?
I will have to think more.
This is correct, which is also why I don't hoard votes, but spend them immediately. Hoarding votes cuts down supply.
I wouldn't say I'm hoarding votes. But I'm not spending them as soon as I get them. Mostly because the only way my voting habits have changed since last era is now I can assign judgment in my voting. "It was worth a vote, but not a full five..." Also to spend votes as soon as you get them smells a bit too arbitrary to me. Vote for what you think deserves it, and if it deserves five points and you only have two, well votelater. Until SSI allow us to add points to previous votes that is.
I see your point Lincoln about spending them immediately being arbitrary, but in fairness there's usually a long backlog of tasks I think need votes. Where you have been a little lucky this era (meaning no disrespect, those tasks were AWESOME) is in having some high point tasks straight away, letting you vote "as it happens". When you always have 20 odd votes you want to make...
I WILL admit to a slightly arbitrary voting strategy on my part though, which is being more likely to vote / vote more for tasks with multiple collaborators. Voting for these greatly accelerates voting in general so...
Well, I've got a vote point now. So, Susy, here is your vote:
A one-year old Spidere, a USBurger and a recently brushed aardvark. And I thought I had it all.

Thomas Beatty Hirschi, the Mayor of Hurricane, approves of your new economy.
I must confess I don´t get it, but hey, thanks, I didn´t have one of these either...
























