MonkeyBoy Dan / Texts
Order by: date ↑ - rating ↑
You need more complete proof for your praxis or it will get flagged.
Photos are good, videos are better.
Fuck yeah (bummer reprise)
Touche
Not freakish, natural.
Bare-footedness is the natural state therefore it is the compressed and deformed shoe wearers of the world with paper thin sole skin that are freakish.
I was born with abnormally wide feet which my parents could not find shoes to fit (without paying extortionate prices for custom made) and as a result I didnt really wear shoes until I started going to school. I have continued go barefoot whenever it is practical, it being much more comfortable.
The toes of my splayed chimp feet do not touch their neighbours at rest although I can bunch them up by clenching like a fist. The 'gaps' between my lower digits elicit revulsion in some - my friend Naomh dislikes feet in general so one of my favourite pranks is to sneak up behind her and grab her ankles between my big and first toes.
I feel a certain queasiness when I see feet that have been habitually squashed into footwear, for me it is the thin end of the wedge that leads to Lily Feet. So there :-P
Mad as a bag of spoons. @_o
Did you see the ghosts?
Or feel their spooktacular presence?
Definitely yes, definitely more points.
Although we also have a Freedom of Information Act here in dear old blighty (which is clearly better than yours because it is signed by the Queen), it's unlikely the FBI is keeping a file on me.
The NSA maybe, due to GCHQ / ECHELON intercepts - while I was in Uni I got very worked up about governments spying on private citizen's personal correspondence and so my email signature included the phrase "I sincerely wish to injure. maim and/or kill US citizens" in order to waste their time with false positive flags. Didn't stop me getting a work visa so probably not.
Would anyone have a problem with non-FBI FOIA material being submitted for this task?
Controversial is good!
Better to be infamous than ignored.
As with all labels, intent and context are all.
If it is factually correct and not used in a derogatory manner I see nothing wrong with it.
To ban terms such as this would be to censor a major component of personal identity.