Tasks / Triclavianist Versus Equilateralist Or Rhomboidist
Measure the great conflict between the triclavianists and their nemeses, regularly known as equilateralists, more properly quadriclavianists, though often referred to in the parlance of our times as rhomboidists (due to the irregularly diagonal or acutely angular nature of their polyganals).
Weigh the possibilities that neither doctrine-system - either that of triclavianism or of quadriclavianism - is plausible, and suggest reasons why biclavians or multiclavians might garner attention in the future.
Well, forget ol' St. Austin / Council of Mela don't mean nothin' /
Mark sixteen, sixteen... belief before ya get tha sheen
-MC Eschatology
75 points suggested
1 to 10 players
0 points
Level 0
Created by Fonne Tayne
0 completed :: 0 in progress
Interested in collaborating on this: (no one yet!)
this task is pretired
Comments
I can't wait to see what happens.
I have to say: I side with the Ignotoclavianists.
Doctrinal Ignotoclavianism: i.e. that the number of nails used in the Crucifixion is an adiaphoron, and thus not a matter of importance to Faith. Those that would foment doctrinal dispute over this matter (Triclavianists, Quadriclavianists, Duodeclavianists, and others of their ilk) are engaged in heresy and must be either corrected or expunged from the body of the Church lest they lead the ignorant away from the Word of God, and thus Salvation.
But what the hell do equilateralists have to do with anything???
Insomnia sucks...